Message 214810 - Python tracker

Message214810

Author	vstinner
Recipients	berker.peksag, eric.araujo, pitrou, tarek, vstinner
Date	2014-03-25.11:25:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAMpsgwY0w-s=k6MNUf+2QacqVYvnz-det2TjR5q7VJhu+D0s4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1395739704.95.0.105177586328.issue19610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> A patch to detect bad type for classifiers in the check command would also be acceptable for 3.5, or to catch it earlier, a check in the Distribution class. Why only in Python 3.5? Does it make sense to pass something different than a list in older Python versions? I would prefer to see a fix the bug fixed in Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5.

Content

> A patch to detect bad type for classifiers in the check command would also be acceptable for 3.5, or to catch it earlier, a check in the Distribution class.

Why only in Python 3.5? Does it make sense to pass something different
than a list in older Python versions?

I would prefer to see a fix the bug fixed in Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-03-25 11:25:21	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, pitrou, tarek, eric.araujo, berker.peksag
2014-03-25 11:25:21	vstinner	link	issue19610 messages
2014-03-25 11:25:21	vstinner	create