Message215250
| Author | nikratio |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Claudiu.Popa, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, nikratio, scoder |
| Date | 2014-03-31.16:37:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1396283877.11.0.356114317916.issue20375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, the new testcases were deliberately included. I submitted the patch prior to the 3.4 release, am I right that at that point this wouldn't have been a problem? I have attached a new patch containing just the doc changes. I hope that's still acceptable for inclusion in 3.4 (and maybe 3.3? not sure if there'll be another bugfix release). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-31 16:37:57 | nikratio | set | recipients: + nikratio, georg.brandl, scoder, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, docs@python, Claudiu.Popa |
| 2014-03-31 16:37:57 | nikratio | set | messageid: <1396283877.11.0.356114317916.issue20375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-03-31 16:37:57 | nikratio | link | issue20375 messages |
| 2014-03-31 16:37:57 | nikratio | create | |