Message216599
| Author | twouters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, kushal.das, loewis, python-dev, twouters, vstinner |
| Date | 2014-04-16.21:34:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1397684069.58.0.0574376212818.issue17861@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here's a minimal patch to at least make the current mechanism work when using a separate build directory. I still don't like the fact that this is importing opcode.py in a different Python than the target Python. Nor do I like that the script hardcodes information about the opcodes (specifically, the first opcode to HAVE_ARGUMENT.) This feels like it's not actually better for maintenance than the previous solution. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-04-16 21:34:29 | twouters | set | recipients: + twouters, loewis, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, python-dev, kushal.das |
| 2014-04-16 21:34:29 | twouters | set | messageid: <1397684069.58.0.0574376212818.issue17861@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-04-16 21:34:29 | twouters | link | issue17861 messages |
| 2014-04-16 21:34:29 | twouters | create | |