Message217371
| Author | tiwilliam |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, neologix, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro, tiwilliam |
| Date | 2014-04-28.13:20:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1398691245.65.0.146486528329.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That makes sense. I proceeded and updated `Lib/gzip.py` to use `io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE` instead. This will change the existing behaviour in two ways: * Start using 1024 * 8 as buffer size instead of 1024. * Add one more kwarg (`buffer_size`) to `GzipFile.__init__()`. Ps. This is my first patch, tell me if I'm missing something. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-04-28 13:20:45 | tiwilliam | set | recipients: + tiwilliam, skip.montanaro, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, neologix, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2014-04-28 13:20:45 | tiwilliam | set | messageid: <1398691245.65.0.146486528329.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-04-28 13:20:45 | tiwilliam | link | issue20962 messages |
| 2014-04-28 13:20:45 | tiwilliam | create | |