Message 217375 - Python tracker

Message217375

Author	vstinner
Recipients	josh.r, jtaylor, neologix, njs, pitrou, skrah, vstinner
Date	2014-04-28.14:09:39
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1398694179.34.0.339588067443.issue21233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> With the latest patch the decimal benchmark with a lot of small > allocations is consistently 2% slower. Does your benchmark use bytes(int) or bytearray(int)? If not, I guess that your benchmark is not reliable because only these two functions are changed by calloc-5.patch, except if there is a bug in my patch.

Content

> With the latest patch the decimal benchmark with a lot of small
> allocations is consistently 2% slower.

Does your benchmark use bytes(int) or bytearray(int)? If not, I guess that your benchmark is not reliable because only these two functions are changed by calloc-5.patch, except if there is a bug in my patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-04-28 14:09:39	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, pitrou, njs, skrah, neologix, jtaylor, josh.r
2014-04-28 14:09:39	vstinner	set	messageid: <1398694179.34.0.339588067443.issue21233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-28 14:09:39	vstinner	link	issue21233 messages
2014-04-28 14:09:39	vstinner	create