Message217391
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro, tiwilliam |
| Date | 2014-04-28.18:22:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1398709321.48.0.427240583039.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> So I'd suggest, instead of using an hardcoded value, to simply reuse io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE. > That way, if some day we decide to change it, all user code wil benefit from the change. I don't think io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE makes much sense as a heuristic for the gzip module (or compressed files in general). Perhaps gzip should get its own DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-04-28 18:22:01 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, neologix, serhiy.storchaka, tiwilliam |
| 2014-04-28 18:22:01 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1398709321.48.0.427240583039.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-04-28 18:22:01 | pitrou | link | issue20962 messages |
| 2014-04-28 18:22:01 | pitrou | create | |