Message217727
| Author | josh.r |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, exarkun, josh.r |
| Date | 2014-05-01.21:18:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1398979081.51.0.692137001257.issue21408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Why would an subclass of object that doesn't redefine either __eq__ or __ne__ have a different behavior for inequality than object itself? Bar never defined __eq__, so it shouldn't have an implicit __ne__ any more than object itself does... Saying that Bar has an implicit __ne__ that object doesn't is answering how this happens, but it's not a why; is there a reason why this should be the case, or is this a bug (either in spec or in code) that should be fixed? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-05-01 21:18:01 | josh.r | set | recipients: + josh.r, exarkun, benjamin.peterson |
| 2014-05-01 21:18:01 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1398979081.51.0.692137001257.issue21408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-05-01 21:18:01 | josh.r | link | issue21408 messages |
| 2014-05-01 21:18:01 | josh.r | create | |