Message218040
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | andreasvc, bquinlan, josh.r, mark.dickinson |
| Date | 2014-05-07.07:55:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1399449359.24.0.468066833647.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
BTW, I think there's a design mistake in the EnhancedThreadPoolExecutor that's worth avoiding in any std. lib. implementation: the initialiser and uninitialiser for the EnhancedThreadPoolExecutor accept no arguments. In retrospect, it would have been better to have them take the thread itself as a single argument. We often found ourselves needing this - it's not hard to work around with a threading.current_thread() call, but it's mildly annoying to have to do so. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-05-07 07:55:59 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, bquinlan, josh.r, andreasvc |
| 2014-05-07 07:55:59 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1399449359.24.0.468066833647.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-05-07 07:55:59 | mark.dickinson | link | issue21423 messages |
| 2014-05-07 07:55:58 | mark.dickinson | create | |