Message218090
| Author | andreasvc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | andreasvc, bquinlan, josh.r, mark.dickinson |
| Date | 2014-05-07.23:15:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1399504538.12.0.586752797168.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here's a patch. I have added initializer and initargs keywords to both ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor, with the same semantics as multiprocessing.Pool. I couldn't figure out what to do if the initializer fails with a ProcessPoolExecutor: how to properly send the traceback back? I also haven't gotten around to figure out how to write tests. I haven't added unitializers, don't know if they would be useful. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-05-07 23:15:38 | andreasvc | set | recipients: + andreasvc, bquinlan, mark.dickinson, josh.r |
| 2014-05-07 23:15:38 | andreasvc | set | messageid: <1399504538.12.0.586752797168.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-05-07 23:15:38 | andreasvc | link | issue21423 messages |
| 2014-05-07 23:15:37 | andreasvc | create | |