Message219854
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, glyph, gvanrossum, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2014-06-05.23:08:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CADiSq7fZungmDDV3vdgAnQs5XWA34tn_swNFoRp2qBoVJ5-1AA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1401984930.71.0.674405173478.issue21669@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
As in, putting something either in the SyntaxError constructor or else in the parser code that emits them? I like that - the fact my initial approach broke a test was rather concerning, and a change purely on the error handling side should be much safer. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-06-05 23:08:22 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, glyph, alex |
| 2014-06-05 23:08:22 | ncoghlan | link | issue21669 messages |
| 2014-06-05 23:08:22 | ncoghlan | create | |