Message219876
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, catalin.iacob, jesstess, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, zvyn |
| Date | 2014-06-06.12:22:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1402057360.15.0.348442746616.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Ah, you are right, I wasn't looking at the full context of the diff when I made the comment about backward compatibility. So ignore that part :) On the other hand, exposing perferred_auth on the class would be a simple API for allowing auth extension (since one really needs to subclass to add an authobject, given that it needs access to self.user and self.password). But, like I said before, that can be a separate issue. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-06-06 12:22:40 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, barry, jesstess, sandro.tosi, catalin.iacob, zvyn |
| 2014-06-06 12:22:40 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1402057360.15.0.348442746616.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-06-06 12:22:40 | r.david.murray | link | issue15014 messages |
| 2014-06-06 12:22:39 | r.david.murray | create | |