Message 221659 - Python tracker

Message221659

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Trundle, abacabadabacaba, benhoyt, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, josh.r, loewis, nailor, ncoghlan, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, rhettinger, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten, twouters, vstinner
Date	2014-06-26.23:05:32
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CADiSq7dqJc==VTYSR=ohFUqw+rGz2GGTM=4n582Oi7JZ5TwM5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1403817417.78.0.347877251694.issue11406@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I suggest a pass through python-ideas first. python-ideas feedback tends to be more oriented towards "is this proposal as persuasive as it could be?", while python-dev is more aimed at the "is this a good idea or not?" yes/no question. (python-ideas feedback naturally includes some of the latter as well, but there's a lot more "I'm not sure I agree with the idea itself, but I agree it's worth discussing further" feedback than is common on python-dev)

Content

I suggest a pass through python-ideas first. python-ideas feedback tends to
be more oriented towards "is this proposal as persuasive as it could be?",
while python-dev is more aimed at the "is this a good idea or not?" yes/no
question. (python-ideas feedback naturally includes some of the latter as
well, but there's a lot more "I'm not sure I agree with the idea itself,
but I agree it's worth discussing further" feedback than is common on
python-dev)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-06-26 23:05:33	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, twouters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, benhoyt, torsten, nvetoshkin, neologix, abacabadabacaba, ethan.furman, nailor, socketpair, josh.r
2014-06-26 23:05:33	ncoghlan	link	issue11406 messages
2014-06-26 23:05:32	ncoghlan	create