Message222860
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Robin.Schreiber, belopolsky, docs@python, loewis, pitrou, skrah |
| Date | 2014-07-12.17:49:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1405187357.75.0.0325529597179.issue15849@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think we should perhaps leave the xxmodule as an example for static types and create another pep-384 version that mentions *potential* performance traps. Of course many modules won't suffer from this, but first-time extension writers tend to paste from the examples and should know the alternatives if they happen to write a performance sensitive application. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-07-12 17:49:17 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, loewis, belopolsky, pitrou, docs@python, Robin.Schreiber |
| 2014-07-12 17:49:17 | skrah | set | messageid: <1405187357.75.0.0325529597179.issue15849@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-07-12 17:49:17 | skrah | link | issue15849 messages |
| 2014-07-12 17:49:17 | skrah | create | |