Message222960
| Author | ezio.melotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ankur.Ankan, Lita.Cho, berker.peksag, ezio.melotti, jesstess, mattrope |
| Date | 2014-07-13.18:04:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1405274695.66.0.176596213799.issue1186900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Wouldn't this be backward incompatible? Even if the EOFError that is raised is not documented explicitly, people might be catching it, and switching to a new exception would break their programs. Maybe NNTPConnectError should inherit from EOFError too? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-07-13 18:04:55 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients: + ezio.melotti, mattrope, jesstess, berker.peksag, Ankur.Ankan, Lita.Cho |
| 2014-07-13 18:04:55 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1405274695.66.0.176596213799.issue1186900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-07-13 18:04:55 | ezio.melotti | link | issue1186900 messages |
| 2014-07-13 18:04:55 | ezio.melotti | create | |