Message224480
| Author | geertj |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, geertj, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2014-08-01.09:39:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1406885979.92.0.675782448885.issue21965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've explored a few options for the Python-level API in the attachment "bio_python_options.py". Me personally I prefer the more light weight option #3. This is both out of selfish interest (less work for me), but also I believe that memory BIOs are an API that will be used almost exclusively by framework authors, not by end users like SSLSocket itself. So a more lower-level (but perfectly valid IMHO) API would be appropriate. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | set | recipients: + geertj, janssen, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, dstufft |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | set | messageid: <1406885979.92.0.675782448885.issue21965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | link | issue21965 messages |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | create | |