Message225174
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | andreasvc, bquinlan, dan.oreilly, giampaolo.rodola, josh.r, mark.dickinson, mdengler, pitrou |
| Date | 2014-08-10.23:48:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1407714525.11.0.359706785689.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It seems the addition of the initargs argument doesn't tackle Mark's objection here: > the initialiser and uninitialiser for the EnhancedThreadPoolExecutor > accept no arguments. In retrospect, it would have been better to have > them take the thread itself as a single argument. Regardless, I'm going to review the patch soon. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-08-10 23:48:45 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, bquinlan, mark.dickinson, giampaolo.rodola, mdengler, josh.r, andreasvc, dan.oreilly |
| 2014-08-10 23:48:45 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1407714525.11.0.359706785689.issue21423@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-08-10 23:48:45 | pitrou | link | issue21423 messages |
| 2014-08-10 23:48:45 | pitrou | create | |