Message225919
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, loewis, pitrou, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2014-08-26.13:38:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <53FC8DED.5040904@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1409059963.01.0.950264138311.issue22117@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Am 26.08.14 15:32, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > >> Instead of a complex structure, we can use a 64-bit signed integer to store a number of nanoseconds. > > Do we have 64-bit integers on all architectures? On all "supported" architectures, yes. gcc supports long long everywhere, using a library if hardware support is not feasible. Visual C++ supports __int64 on all targets. Other compilers typically strive for compatibility with either of these two. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-08-26 13:38:53 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, tim.peters, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner |
| 2014-08-26 13:38:53 | loewis | link | issue22117 messages |
| 2014-08-26 13:38:53 | loewis | create | |