Message226131
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ben.Darnell, alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, geertj, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, janssen, pitrou, sbt, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-08-30.09:01:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1409389271.28.0.514194317863.issue21965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Nice work, thank you! The new API looks mostly good to me. I am wondering about a couple of things: - is it necessary to start exposing server_hostname, server_side and pending()? - SSLObject is a bit vague, should we call it SSLMemoryObject? or do you expect we may want to support other kinds of BIOs some day? - should the basic implementations in SSLObject be shared (using some kind of mixin) with SSLSocket, or is it unpractical to do so? I'll take a look at the code later. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-08-30 09:01:11 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, geertj, janssen, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, alex, sbt, Ben.Darnell, yselivanov, dstufft |
| 2014-08-30 09:01:11 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1409389271.28.0.514194317863.issue21965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-08-30 09:01:11 | pitrou | link | issue21965 messages |
| 2014-08-30 09:01:10 | pitrou | create | |