Message229201
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | andtorg, kbk, ned.deily, python-dev, roger.serwy, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2014-10-12.22:17:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1413152264.95.0.991900961303.issue20567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
You left this issue number off your tkinter test updates, such as f6f098bdb843. By using .update_idletasks instead of .update, are you assuming that their are no user events, or that they should be ignormed? I was wondering whether it would be Ok, if not a good idea, to run tests, and maybe Idle itself, with NoDefaultRoot. I see that is already done for tkinter tests. I cannot use exactly the same design as AbstractTkTest since I sometimes do other things in setUp/tearDownClass, but I could define create_test_root() and delete_test_root() functions in a support file. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-10-12 22:17:45 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, kbk, ned.deily, roger.serwy, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, andtorg |
| 2014-10-12 22:17:44 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1413152264.95.0.991900961303.issue20567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-10-12 22:17:44 | terry.reedy | link | issue20567 messages |
| 2014-10-12 22:17:44 | terry.reedy | create | |