Message229861
| Author | rbcollins |
|---|---|
| Recipients | hpk, michael.foord, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, rbcollins |
| Date | 2014-10-23.07:54:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1414050857.27.0.11484573086.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
My take on this, FWIW, is that any methods in the under-test API - setUp, tearDown, test_* and anything registered via addCleanup should all support the same protocol as much as possible, whatever it is. That is, raising a skip in setUp should skip the test. raising a skip in tearDown should skip the test, and raising a skip from a cleanup should skip the test. This is complicated by the case where some code is called after exceptions- teardown and cleanups. Thats fairly straight forward: errors are higher precedence than failure than skips than anything which resolved as a pass. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-10-23 07:54:17 | rbcollins | set | recipients: + rbcollins, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, michael.foord, hpk |
| 2014-10-23 07:54:17 | rbcollins | set | messageid: <1414050857.27.0.11484573086.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-10-23 07:54:17 | rbcollins | link | issue10548 messages |
| 2014-10-23 07:54:16 | rbcollins | create | |