Message229875
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | hpk, michael.foord, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, rbcollins |
| Date | 2014-10-23.14:51:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1414075908.46.0.603656020994.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree with Robert. I'd rather get notified of a failure in the cleanup...if the test is an *expected* failure, then its cleanup should be designed to succeed when the test fails; anything else would be a bug in the design of the test, IMO. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-10-23 14:51:48 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, ncoghlan, rbcollins, michael.foord, hpk |
| 2014-10-23 14:51:48 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1414075908.46.0.603656020994.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-10-23 14:51:48 | r.david.murray | link | issue10548 messages |
| 2014-10-23 14:51:48 | r.david.murray | create | |