Message231481
| Author | Rosuav |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rosuav, gvanrossum, python-dev, schlamar |
| Date | 2014-11-21.17:24:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1416590656.75.0.949948318081.issue22906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Marc, are those all cases where the "raise StopIteration" is actually inside a generator? If so, it can be trivially replaced with "return". Yes, it'll break that way of spelling it, but it's a completely mechanical transformation, and making the change won't break your code for previous versions of Python. Personally, I would recommend using "return" there anyway, regardless of this proposal. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-11-21 17:24:16 | Rosuav | set | recipients: + Rosuav, gvanrossum, python-dev, schlamar |
| 2014-11-21 17:24:16 | Rosuav | set | messageid: <1416590656.75.0.949948318081.issue22906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-11-21 17:24:16 | Rosuav | link | issue22906 messages |
| 2014-11-21 17:24:16 | Rosuav | create | |