Message232036
| Author | steve.dower |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date | 2014-12-02.18:40:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1417545657.4.0.177414865595.issue22980@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I was more interested in source file resolution than bytecode caching. If Python 3.5 would prefer "spam.cpython-35.py" or "spam.cpython-3.py" over "spam.py" and Python 2 preferred "spam.py", then I can more easily separate the code that won't parse in the alternative. Happy to be told it's unrelated and I should raise it separately, but from my POV resolving .pyd filenames looks very similar to resolving .py files. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-12-02 18:40:57 | steve.dower | set | recipients: + steve.dower, lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware |
| 2014-12-02 18:40:57 | steve.dower | set | messageid: <1417545657.4.0.177414865595.issue22980@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-12-02 18:40:57 | steve.dower | link | issue22980 messages |
| 2014-12-02 18:40:57 | steve.dower | create | |