Message234411
| Author | NeilGirdhar |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, Rosuav, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, berker.peksag, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz |
| Date | 2015-01-20.23:51:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1421797902.22.0.226375167319.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Why is that correct? The PEP mentions overriding. Right now each dict overrides values from the last silently, which I think makes sense. The keyword arguments you pass in override keys from previous dicts (also good I think). The problem is that you can pass multiple duplicate keyword arguments, and the one below, which I think should succeed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-01-20 23:51:42 | NeilGirdhar | set | recipients: + NeilGirdhar, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, eric.snow, Rosuav, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, pconnell, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
| 2015-01-20 23:51:42 | NeilGirdhar | set | messageid: <1421797902.22.0.226375167319.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-01-20 23:51:42 | NeilGirdhar | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2015-01-20 23:51:42 | NeilGirdhar | create | |