Message235018
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, berker.peksag, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz |
| Date | 2015-01-30.02:46:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAP7+vJJ9v3U_6XP+OtG08nq_T9v6pskRT8uY1Q7_buZbmuLpwQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1422577953.78.0.978015418074.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi Neil, I think disallowing them is the best approach. There doesn't seem to be a good use case that would be thwarted. Hopefully the syntactic prohibition isn't too hard to implement. On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Neil Girdhar <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Neil Girdhar added the comment: > > All tests pass. > > @Guido: can we get some clarification on f(*… and f(**…? One option is to > make them illegal for now and then open them up in a future PEP when it's > more clear what's wanted? > > ---------- > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37911/starunpack25.diff > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292> > _______________________________________ > |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-01-30 02:46:10 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
| 2015-01-30 02:46:10 | gvanrossum | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2015-01-30 02:46:09 | gvanrossum | create | |