Message235647
| Author | benjamin.peterson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz |
| Date | 2015-02-09.23:17:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1423523860.3352834.225361421.015763C9@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1423523737.74.0.766494247363.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 18:15, Neil Girdhar wrote: > > Neil Girdhar added the comment: > > Thank you, Benjamin. > > It's my nature to keep code consistent/clean, but I realize that I can > get carried away. Should I revert all incidental PEP 7 style changes? Yes, please. > > Regarding the args/keywords, where do you mean? If you're talking about > compile.c, we can't merge them because the call_function operand expects > to see the positional arguments below the keyword arguments on the stack. You can ignore this suggestion, since it occurred to me after misinterpreting the PEP. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-02-09 23:17:42 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients: + benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, ethan.furman, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
| 2015-02-09 23:17:42 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2015-02-09 23:17:42 | benjamin.peterson | create | |