Message236071
| Author | giampaolo.rodola |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, felipecruz, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, meador.inge, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, rosslagerwall, sbt, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-02-15.21:31:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1424035915.31.0.156723174627.issue18932@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Attached is a patch (for epoll only) which updates the SelectorKey. This introduces a considerable slowdown compared to my first patch: no patch: 16.2 usec per loop your patch: 12.4 usec per loop my patch: 10.9 usec per loop first patch: 3.07 usec per loop The culprit is the new nameduple's _replace() call. It's a shame a single line adds such a great slowdown. I think it makes sense to investigate whether we can introduce a faster replace mechanism for namedtuple. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-02-15 21:31:55 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients: + giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, meador.inge, neologix, rosslagerwall, python-dev, sbt, felipecruz, yselivanov |
| 2015-02-15 21:31:55 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1424035915.31.0.156723174627.issue18932@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-02-15 21:31:55 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue18932 messages |
| 2015-02-15 21:31:55 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |