Message237720
| Author | ned.deily |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benhoyt, larry, ned.deily, paul.moore, python-dev, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date | 2015-03-09.22:55:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1425941716.16.0.34922921101.issue23619@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
"Not sure that we have any precedent for dealing with tests that require admin privileges when installed but not in the source tree?" I think we do. With the OS X installer (and, in theory, other Posix-style installs), we have a similar situation where tests are installed without a source tree and I believe they should be expected to be runnable by the user without admin privileges, where necessary, skipping those few test cases that *might* actually need elevated privs. Granted, we currently don't do a lot of systematic testing of tests from installed locations. I do as part of the OS X installer building and testing. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-03-09 22:55:16 | ned.deily | set | recipients: + ned.deily, terry.reedy, paul.moore, vstinner, larry, tim.golden, benhoyt, python-dev, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2015-03-09 22:55:16 | ned.deily | set | messageid: <1425941716.16.0.34922921101.issue23619@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-03-09 22:55:16 | ned.deily | link | issue23619 messages |
| 2015-03-09 22:55:16 | ned.deily | create | |