Message238023
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benhoyt, python-dev, scott.dial, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-03-13.10:37:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1426243073.89.0.00873686546561.issue23605@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't understand your benchmark. Do you mean that os.walk() is slower with fast_bottom-up.patch because islink() is called or because I replaced "for entry in scandir(top):" with "entry = next(scandir_it)"? Are you testing the top-bottom or bottom-up? Here is a variant of my patch with "for entry in scandir(top):". I would prefer to avoid this variant with a boolean to not catch OSError on the recursive call to walk() if next() has similar performances. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-03-13 10:37:53 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, scott.dial, benhoyt, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015-03-13 10:37:53 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1426243073.89.0.00873686546561.issue23605@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-03-13 10:37:53 | vstinner | link | issue23605 messages |
| 2015-03-13 10:37:53 | vstinner | create | |