Message238372
| Author | nikratio |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, martin.panter, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2015-03-18.02:31:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1426645874.26.0.290549655316.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
If you want to add support for buffer_size=0 in a separate patch/issue I think that's fine. But in that case I would not add a buffer_size parameter now at all. IMO, not having it is better as having it but not supporting zero (even if it's documented that's pretty surprising). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-03-18 02:31:14 | nikratio | set | recipients: + nikratio, pitrou, Arfrever, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015-03-18 02:31:14 | nikratio | set | messageid: <1426645874.26.0.290549655316.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-03-18 02:31:14 | nikratio | link | issue23529 messages |
| 2015-03-18 02:31:13 | nikratio | create | |