Message240451
| Author | llllllllll |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, eric.smith, llllllllll |
| Date | 2015-04-10.21:54:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1428702884.14.0.22651531508.issue23910@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
would the idea be to deprecate namedtuple in favor of a public structseq that is exposed through collections, or change structseq to fit the namedtuple API? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-10 21:54:44 | llllllllll | set | recipients: + llllllllll, barry, eric.smith |
| 2015-04-10 21:54:44 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1428702884.14.0.22651531508.issue23910@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-10 21:54:44 | llllllllll | link | issue23910 messages |
| 2015-04-10 21:54:43 | llllllllll | create | |