Message240882
| Author | djmitche |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Andrew.C, amaury.forgeotdarc, djmitche, effbot, kirkshorts, meador.inge |
| Date | 2015-04-14.13:35:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429018508.04.0.223784779841.issue3353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
From my read of this bug, there are two distinct tasks mentioned: 1. make PyTokenizer_* part of the Python-level API 2. re-implement 'tokenize' in terms of that Python-level API #1 is largely complete in Andrew's latest patch, but that will likely need: * rebasing * hiding struct fields * documentation #2 is, I think, a separate project. There may be good reasons *not* to do this which I'm not aware of, and barring such reasons the rewrite will be difficult and could potentially change behavior like issue2180. So I would suggest filing a new issue for #2 when #1 is complete. And I'll work on #1. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-14 13:35:08 | djmitche | set | recipients: + djmitche, effbot, amaury.forgeotdarc, kirkshorts, meador.inge, Andrew.C |
| 2015-04-14 13:35:08 | djmitche | set | messageid: <1429018508.04.0.223784779841.issue3353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-14 13:35:08 | djmitche | link | issue3353 messages |
| 2015-04-14 13:35:07 | djmitche | create | |