Message241266
| Author | skip.montanaro |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gurnec, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro |
| Date | 2015-04-16.19:24:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429212287.76.0.420931930573.issue23974@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm completely unqualified to offer a concrete, expert opinion here, but it seems like defaulting _maxwidth to 1L<<52 should work. I have no idea of the resulting performance implications though. >>> for bpf in (45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53): ... print bpf, ... print sum(randrange(2**53 * 2//3, _maxwidth=1L<<bpf) % 2 for i in xrange(1000000)) / 1000000.0, ... print sum(randrange(2**52 * 2//3, _maxwidth=1L<<bpf) % 2 for i in xrange(1000000)) / 1000000.0 ... 45 0.499959 0.500144 46 0.501622 0.500371 47 0.500257 0.499692 48 0.499567 0.499942 49 0.499789 0.50028 50 0.499882 0.500488 51 0.500479 0.50006 52 0.500553 0.500234 53 0.33275 0.500296 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-16 19:24:47 | skip.montanaro | set | recipients: + skip.montanaro, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, gurnec |
| 2015-04-16 19:24:47 | skip.montanaro | set | messageid: <1429212287.76.0.420931930573.issue23974@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-16 19:24:47 | skip.montanaro | link | issue23974 messages |
| 2015-04-16 19:24:47 | skip.montanaro | create | |