Message241379
| Author | llllllllll |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Claudiu.Popa, belopolsky, christian.heimes, ethan.furman, ionelmc, llllllllll |
| Date | 2015-04-17.23:13:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429312417.39.0.464531577353.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think that using a property to define a callable in the class is a bug; while it seems less ideal, I don't understand why it would be unsupported with callable when it executes correctly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-17 23:13:37 | llllllllll | set | recipients: + llllllllll, belopolsky, christian.heimes, ionelmc, Claudiu.Popa, ethan.furman |
| 2015-04-17 23:13:37 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1429312417.39.0.464531577353.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-17 23:13:37 | llllllllll | link | issue23990 messages |
| 2015-04-17 23:13:37 | llllllllll | create | |