Message241542
| Author | ionelmc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Claudiu.Popa, belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ionelmc, jedwards, llllllllll, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2015-04-19.19:05:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CANkHFr-Y8sCmBeJF-9inONjhwKdosKDqvAiQas_PikBsHLG5LQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1429470105.31.0.0386692498501.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Ethan Furman <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > The "right thing", using a meta-class, is to have the meta-class check if > the proxied object is callable, and if so, put in the __call__ function in > the class that is being created. Yes indeed, for a plain proxy. Unfortunately for a *lazy* proxy this is not acceptable as it would "create" (or "access") the target. The point is to delay that till it's actually needed, not when the proxy is created. Thanks, -- Ionel Cristian Mărieș, http://blog.ionelmc.ro |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-19 19:05:24 | ionelmc | set | recipients: + ionelmc, terry.reedy, belopolsky, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa, ethan.furman, eric.snow, llllllllll, jedwards |
| 2015-04-19 19:05:24 | ionelmc | link | issue23990 messages |
| 2015-04-19 19:05:24 | ionelmc | create | |