Message241597
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Claudiu.Popa, belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ionelmc, jedwards, llllllllll, r.david.murray, rhettinger, steven.daprano, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2015-04-20.04:02:26 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429502547.13.0.338529314806.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Unless there are some serious objections, I propose to close this on the basis of "practicality beats purity" (and as David Murray noted, there may not be a pure answer). Eric Snow's comments are dead-on. AFAICT, there isn't a real problem here and the API for better-or-worse has proven to be usable in practice (the callable() API has been around practically forever and the descriptor protocol has been around since Py2.2 -- if there were a real issue here, it would have reared it head long ago). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-20 04:02:27 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, christian.heimes, ionelmc, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa, ethan.furman, eric.snow, llllllllll, jedwards |
| 2015-04-20 04:02:27 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1429502547.13.0.338529314806.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-20 04:02:27 | rhettinger | link | issue23990 messages |
| 2015-04-20 04:02:26 | rhettinger | create | |