Message241610
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Julien.Palard, Ramchandra Apte, berker.peksag, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, gruszczy, martin.panter, meatballhat, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2015-04-20.06:05:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAGE7PNLQsSRNzHV7qWGOrKJofgimtc1Bzv56XmtTG=v2UN2JTQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1429507889.85.0.149098065423.issue8706@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I wouldn't make an efficiency argument against it without trying it and showing reproducible degradation in the hg.python.org/benchmarks suite. On Sun, Apr 19, 2015, 10:31 PM Serhiy Storchaka <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > > Supporting keyword arguments has performance loss. For fast builtins it > make be significant. We should defer adding keyword arguments support until > more efficient parsing will implemented. Note that it is easier to > implement efficient argument parsing for functions with positional-only > arguments (see for example issue23867). > > ---------- > nosy: +serhiy.storchaka > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue8706> > _______________________________________ > |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-20 06:05:46 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, brian.curtin, gruszczy, meatballhat, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, berker.peksag, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, Julien.Palard |
| 2015-04-20 06:05:46 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue8706 messages |
| 2015-04-20 06:05:46 | gregory.p.smith | create | |