Message241701
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-04-21.05:09:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429592946.12.0.197474172279.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Is it a problem that the check can't be done in a fast way from C code? C code can still quickly special case the generator type in the positive case, and it will usually be interested in an exact type match anyway. Determining that an object is *not* (compatible with) a generator might lead to some degradation, but in most cases, at least in the interpreter core, this would be an error case anyway, so being slower here should rarely hurt. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-21 05:09:06 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2015-04-21 05:09:06 | scoder | set | messageid: <1429592946.12.0.197474172279.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-21 05:09:06 | scoder | link | issue24018 messages |
| 2015-04-21 05:09:05 | scoder | create | |