Message241703
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-04-21.05:26:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429593962.56.0.604146287404.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree that there is no big reason why we should force generators to stop working after close(). Your new default implementation of close() is probably the right thing too. I added a few new comments on Reitveld. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-21 05:26:02 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, lukasz.langa, yselivanov |
| 2015-04-21 05:26:02 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1429593962.56.0.604146287404.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-21 05:26:02 | martin.panter | link | issue24018 messages |
| 2015-04-21 05:26:02 | martin.panter | create | |