Message241705
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-04-21.06:35:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429598110.5.0.772374867813.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> should inspect.isgenerator() be changed? Replying to myself, one thing that speaks against this approach is that "inspect" also has the functions "getgeneratorlocals()" and "getgeneratorstate()", which depend on "gen.gi_frame". Cython could emulate that, but normal user code usually can't. It's definitely not part of the Generator protocol but an implementation detail of GeneratorType. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-21 06:35:10 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2015-04-21 06:35:10 | scoder | set | messageid: <1429598110.5.0.772374867813.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-21 06:35:10 | scoder | link | issue24018 messages |
| 2015-04-21 06:35:10 | scoder | create | |