Message241717
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-04-21.15:44:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1429631042.08.0.559354322468.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, code usually doesn't fall from the sky with a new CPython release. If something wants to make use of this ABC, it still has to find ways to also work with older CPythons. What would be a good fallback? A backport on PyPI? I wouldn't even mind shipping this class with Cython and dropping it right into "collections.abc" if it's missing. Cython already contains lots of compatibility code, and we need to patch *something* in all current CPythons either way. Then your code snippet would be the right thing to do for user code (with the twist that Py2.x doesn't have "collections.abc"...). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-21 15:44:02 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2015-04-21 15:44:02 | scoder | set | messageid: <1429631042.08.0.559354322468.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-21 15:44:02 | scoder | link | issue24018 messages |
| 2015-04-21 15:44:01 | scoder | create | |