Message242114
| Author | llllllllll |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, eric.smith, eric.snow, llllllllll, rhettinger |
| Date | 2015-04-27.13:13:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1430140403.77.0.883111113369.issue23910@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think that I can cache the __call__ of the fget object because it might be an instance of a heaptype, and if someone changed the __class__ of the object in between calls to another heaptype that had a different __call__, you would still get the __call__ from the first type. I also don't know if this is supported behavior or just something that works by accident. I read through PyObject_Call, and all the code is needed assuming we are not caching the tp_call value. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-04-27 13:13:23 | llllllllll | set | recipients: + llllllllll, barry, rhettinger, eric.smith, eric.snow |
| 2015-04-27 13:13:23 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1430140403.77.0.883111113369.issue23910@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-04-27 13:13:23 | llllllllll | link | issue23910 messages |
| 2015-04-27 13:13:23 | llllllllll | create | |