Message242625
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, steve.dower, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz |
| Date | 2015-05-05.23:48:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAP7+vJJCAUj21s4ggdRvMn_jROrMKfXxAUEgdrxsaqtP-jNNGA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <CAP7+vJ+GD2CH+2mxzrmOGP2Fx5F1Rd0LjbRedp3yYcamBXuA3w@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
(To clarify, the PEP itself probably serves as enough documentation in the interim.) On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote: > Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The > source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will > have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you > shooting for? I had hoped yesterday... > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> > wrote: > >> >> Benjamin Peterson added the comment: >> >> It certainly would be nice to have documentation. >> >> ---------- >> >> _______________________________________ >> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> >> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292> >> _______________________________________ >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, ethan.furman, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, steve.dower, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
| 2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | create | |