Message243033
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, python-dev, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-05-13.05:00:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1431493258.24.0.326818780244.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm bothered by the remarkable proliferation of new opcodes for the PEP 492 handling. Is there are a specific reason this implicit exception handler can't be decomposed and implemented using the same opcodes as are used to implement explicit exception handlers? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-05-13 05:00:58 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, asvetlov, python-dev, yselivanov |
| 2015-05-13 05:00:58 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1431493258.24.0.326818780244.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-05-13 05:00:58 | ncoghlan | link | issue24017 messages |
| 2015-05-13 05:00:58 | ncoghlan | create | |