Message244106
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | martin.panter, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2015-05-26.14:43:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1432651400.38.0.732865670264.issue24284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Just in the what's new porting section, I think. The fact that there "should" be very little to no code that relies on this is why I'd like to see it fixed. The fact that the report was a theoretical one, and not one that broke code, is why I think we should fix it only in 3.5. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-05-26 14:43:20 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, rhettinger, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015-05-26 14:43:20 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1432651400.38.0.732865670264.issue24284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-05-26 14:43:20 | r.david.murray | link | issue24284 messages |
| 2015-05-26 14:43:20 | r.david.murray | create | |