Message244273
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, python-dev, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-05-28.05:35:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1432791353.73.0.128998767255.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Given that tp_call is just "ternaryfunc", my guess would be "because when the iterator protocol was added, someone went with function-pointer-type-per-slot rather than function-pointer-type-per-call-signature". We *are* a little inconsistent here (e.g. "reprfunc" could also just use the "unaryfunc" signature), but Stefan's right that that isn't a good reason to *add* to the inconsistency. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-05-28 05:35:53 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, asvetlov, python-dev, yselivanov |
| 2015-05-28 05:35:53 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1432791353.73.0.128998767255.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-05-28 05:35:53 | ncoghlan | link | issue24017 messages |
| 2015-05-28 05:35:53 | ncoghlan | create | |