Message244280
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, python-dev, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-05-28.06:28:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1432794516.54.0.945521559333.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
BTW, given that "iter(iterator)" works and returns the iterator, should we also allow "await x.__await__()" to work? I guess that would be tricky to achieve given that __await__() is only required to return any kind of arbitrary Iterator, and Iterators cannot be awaited due to deliberate restrictions. But it might be nice to have for wrapping purposes. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-05-28 06:28:36 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, vstinner, asvetlov, python-dev, yselivanov |
| 2015-05-28 06:28:36 | scoder | set | messageid: <1432794516.54.0.945521559333.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-05-28 06:28:36 | scoder | link | issue24017 messages |
| 2015-05-28 06:28:36 | scoder | create | |