Message 244504 - Python tracker

Message244504

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	gvanrossum, larry, ncoghlan, scoder, yselivanov
Date	2015-05-31.00:35:30
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAP7+vJLa7L4p_REV5HqkRjs64XpXzpFdSkJibhC677JN4D3Nog@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1433017346.39.0.349591009262.issue24325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Since it's a speedup it could also go into 3.5.1. On May 30, 2015 1:22 PM, "Yury Selivanov" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Yury Selivanov added the comment: > > Larry, can you accept the first version of the patch (only function that > patches code object's co_flags) after beta2? > > I'm OK if you think it should only be committed in 3.6, but I also agree > with Stefan, that using C is better in this particular case. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue24325> > _______________________________________ >

Content

Since it's a speedup it could also go into 3.5.1.
On May 30, 2015 1:22 PM, "Yury Selivanov" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Yury Selivanov added the comment:
>
> Larry, can you accept the first version of the patch (only function that
> patches code object's co_flags) after beta2?
>
> I'm OK if you think it should only be committed in 3.6, but I also agree
> with Stefan, that using C is better in this particular case.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24325>
> _______________________________________
>

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-05-31 00:35:32	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, ncoghlan, scoder, larry, yselivanov
2015-05-31 00:35:31	gvanrossum	link	issue24325 messages
2015-05-31 00:35:30	gvanrossum	create