Message245652
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, catalin.iacob, jesstess, python-dev, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, zvyn |
| Date | 2015-06-22.22:00:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1435010428.05.0.000926948967956.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Sounds reasonable. I'll suggest a slight variation. We change the authobj signature to challenge=None, then the first thing we do in auth is 'initial_response = authobj()'. The return value can be the empty string or a real initial value, and we send the auth command with ' '.join(mechanism, initial_response).strip(). Then we do the challenge part only if we get the 334. There's already an open issue for smtpd auth, with at least a preliminary patch, but it got blocked a bit by Martin quoting an RFC... |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-06-22 22:00:28 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, barry, jesstess, sandro.tosi, catalin.iacob, python-dev, zvyn |
| 2015-06-22 22:00:28 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1435010428.05.0.000926948967956.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-06-22 22:00:28 | r.david.murray | link | issue15014 messages |
| 2015-06-22 22:00:27 | r.david.murray | create | |