Message245654
| Author | barry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, catalin.iacob, jesstess, python-dev, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, zvyn |
| Date | 2015-06-22.22:05:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20150622180549.343b50d5@anarchist.wooz.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1435010428.05.0.000926948967956.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:00 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >We change the authobj signature to challenge=None, then the first thing we do >in auth is 'initial_response = authobj()'. The return value can be the empty >string or a real initial value, and we send the auth command with ' >'.join(mechanism, initial_response).strip(). Then we do the challenge part >only if we get the 334. Sounds good to me. I'll see if I can work up a patch. I have a hack in my testing code to work around the lack of auth in smtpd. It's not pretty but it works. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-06-22 22:05:55 | barry | set | recipients: + barry, r.david.murray, jesstess, sandro.tosi, catalin.iacob, python-dev, zvyn |
| 2015-06-22 22:05:55 | barry | link | issue15014 messages |
| 2015-06-22 22:05:55 | barry | create | |